SRCCUTOVERDESTIndependent · No vendor bias · Updated Apr 2026
Workload · SharePoint On-Prem -> SharePoint Online

SharePoint on-prem to SharePoint Online migration cost, 2026

The migration most enterprises put off because of the customisation tail. Per-site collection pricing, the cost of rewriting SharePoint Designer workflows to Power Automate, InfoPath form replacement, farm solution remediation, and a worked 200-site scenario showing the cost shape of a real mid-enterprise programme.

SharePoint Server migration to SharePoint Online is the collaboration migration most enterprises defer because of the customisation tail. The technology is well-understood, the migration tools are mature, and the source data movement is straightforward. What makes the programme expensive is the decade of custom workflows, InfoPath forms, branding, web parts, and farm solutions that have accumulated since the original SharePoint deployment. This page is the 2026 cost reference for SharePoint to SharePoint Online migration with a focus on the customisation cost line items that dominate the budget.

What migrates cleanly and what does not

The first decision in any SharePoint migration is to inventory what exists on the source farm and classify each item by migration complexity. The categorisation determines the cost shape of the programme.

SharePoint to SharePoint Online migration complexity by feature

FeatureMigration complexityPer-instance costNotes
Document libraries with standard contentLow$200 to $800 per librarySPMT handles cleanly
Lists with standard columnsLow$150 to $600 per listSPMT handles cleanly
Sites with standard permissionsLow$400 to $1,500 per sitePermission mapping required but tractable
Pages with classic web partsMedium$300 to $1,200 per pageClassic web parts mostly supported in Online; modern web parts preferred
Sites with custom branding (master pages)Medium-High$5,000 to $25,000 per siteBranding rebuild via SharePoint Theme or SPFx extension
SharePoint Designer workflowsHigh$800 to $5,000 per workflowRewrite to Power Automate required
InfoPath formsHigh$2,000 to $12,000 per formReplace with Power Apps or Lists; InfoPath end-of-life Oct 2026
SharePoint Add-ins (Apps)Medium-High$3,000 to $20,000 per add-inSome migrate cleanly; many need SPFx rewrite
Farm solutions (.NET code)Very High$8,000 to $300,000+ per solutionCannot migrate; full rewrite to SPFx required
Custom Search vertical or scopeMedium$2,000 to $8,000 per customisationReplace with SharePoint Online search verticals
Site collection feature dependenciesMedium$500 to $4,000 per dependencyAudit and remediate each feature dependency

SharePoint Designer workflows, the largest customisation line

SharePoint Designer workflows are the most common customisation in mid-enterprise SharePoint estates. They were the default tool for business users and citizen developers to automate SharePoint processes for the decade after SharePoint 2010 launched. The cost in any SharePoint migration is dominated by the rewrite of these workflows to Power Automate, because SharePoint Online does not support them natively.

The conversion challenge. Power Automate is a different engine with a different action set, a different connector model, and a different error-handling approach. A SharePoint Designer workflow that updates a list item, sends an approval email, and creates a Teams message based on conditional logic translates to a Power Automate flow with three to seven actions, plus error handling, plus security context configuration, plus connector licensing considerations. The rewrite typically takes 4 to 24 hours per workflow depending on complexity.

A mid-enterprise SharePoint estate often has 100 to 500 SharePoint Designer workflows accumulated over a decade. At a blended $1,800 per workflow rewrite (including discovery, rewrite, testing, deployment, and end-user validation), the workflow rewrite cost alone lands at $180K to $900K. This is frequently the single largest line item in a SharePoint migration programme. The cost discipline that works is rationalisation: most estates have 30 to 50 percent of workflows that no one actively uses and can be retired rather than rewritten.

The workflow rationalisation rule

For a 200-workflow inventory, expect to discover that 40 to 60 percent of workflows fall into one of three categories: never executed in the past 12 months, executed for a process that no longer exists, or actively in use but easily replaced with a simpler standard feature (Microsoft Lists rules, approvals via Outlook). Rationalising before rewriting typically saves 30 to 50 percent of workflow rewrite cost.

InfoPath forms, the end-of-life pressure

InfoPath was officially deprecated in 2014 and reaches end-of-life for SharePoint Online in October 2026. After end-of-life, InfoPath forms will not render in SharePoint Online and must be replaced. The replacement options: Power Apps (for full custom forms with business logic), Microsoft Lists with custom forms (for simpler scenarios), or third-party forms tools (Nintex, K2, Plumsail).

Mid-enterprise estates often have 50 to 300 InfoPath forms with associated business processes. The replacement cost per form varies widely: simple data-collection forms rebuild as Lists with custom forms for $1,000 to $3,000 each; complex multi-step business forms with workflow integration rebuild as Power Apps for $5,000 to $25,000 each. The October 2026 deadline forces the work; estates that have not started the replacement by mid-2026 face significant timeline pressure.

Farm solutions, the most expensive line

Farm solutions (full-trust .NET code deployed directly to the SharePoint farm) cannot migrate to SharePoint Online. The SharePoint Online security model does not permit full-trust code execution in the SharePoint application pool. Farm solutions must be rewritten as SharePoint Framework (SPFx) extensions, Power Platform components, or Azure-hosted applications integrated via the SharePoint REST APIs.

The cost varies enormously depending on what the farm solution does. A simple branding farm solution (custom master page, custom CSS) might rewrite as an SPFx Application Customizer for $5K to $20K. A line-of-business application built as a farm solution (custom timer jobs, custom event receivers, custom service applications) might require $100K to $500K+ of rebuild work. Mid-enterprise estates that grew organically often have three to fifteen farm solutions of mixed complexity, with the rebuild cost frequently exceeding $300K in total.

Worked 200-site collection scenario

A representative cost build for a mid-enterprise SharePoint 2019 to SharePoint Online migration: 200 site collections (180 standard, 15 branded, 5 with farm solutions), 250 SharePoint Designer workflows (after rationalisation), 80 InfoPath forms, 12-month programme, partner-led with FastTrack support for the core data movement, ShareGate Migrate for the heavy lifting.

Worked SharePoint to SP Online cost build, 200 sites, 12 months

Cost lineLow estimateTypical estimateHigh estimate
Assessment and customisation inventory$35,000$70,000$150,000
Workflow rationalisation (before rewrite)$15,000$30,000$60,000
ShareGate Migrate licensing (12 months)$25,000$60,000$100,000
Site collection migration labour (200 sites)$80,000$180,000$420,000
Branding remediation (15 branded sites)$60,000$160,000$380,000
Farm solution rewrite (5 solutions, mixed complexity)$100,000$280,000$700,000
SharePoint Designer workflow rewrite (150 after rationalisation)$120,000$280,000$640,000
InfoPath form replacement (80 forms)$120,000$320,000$800,000
FastTrack value (Microsoft-funded)($25,000)($45,000)($80,000)
End-user training and adoption$15,000$35,000$80,000
Cutover support and hypercare (6 weeks)$25,000$55,000$120,000
Source SharePoint decommission$15,000$30,000$70,000
Contingency at 15 percent$90,000$220,000$520,000
Net total estimate$675,000$1,675,000$3,960,000

The typical-column number, $1.675M for 200 sites over 12 months, works out at roughly $8,400 per site collection all-in. That is significantly higher than the per-site headline band because the cost is dominated not by sites but by customisations: workflows ($280K), forms ($320K), farm solutions ($280K), and branding ($160K) together account for over $1M of the total. The cost discipline for SharePoint migration is almost always about customisation rationalisation before rewrite.

How to reduce SharePoint to SP Online migration cost

  1. Inventory customisations first. Most estates have substantially more customisation than expected and the discovery work pays for itself many times over.
  2. Rationalise workflows aggressively. The 30 to 50 percent that no one actively uses can be retired rather than rewritten.
  3. Replace InfoPath forms ahead of the October 2026 deadline. The cost of rushed replacement under deadline pressure is higher than planned replacement.
  4. Use the migration as an opportunity to rebuild farm solutions on modern patterns. The rewrite cost is real but the SPFx and Power Platform pattern is more maintainable long-term.
  5. Use SharePoint Online out-of-the-box features where possible. Modern SharePoint has features (Microsoft Lists, Pages, News, Hub Sites) that replace many of the customisations created in earlier SharePoint versions.
  6. Use FastTrack for the core data movement.
  7. Migrate in waves by department or business unit. Departmental waves align with the customisation ownership and reduce coordination overhead.
  8. Plan the source decommission deliberately. Every month of source SharePoint operations carries licensing, hardware, and operational labour cost.

SharePoint Server to SharePoint Online migration is dominated by customisation rather than by data. The teams that succeed at SharePoint migration cost are the ones that treat the customisation rationalisation as the project, with the data movement as the easier follow-on. The October 2026 InfoPath deadline adds urgency to the timeline. The discipline that produces an on-budget outcome is rigorous customisation inventory at assessment, aggressive rationalisation before rewrite, and disciplined use of modern out-of-the-box SharePoint Online features rather than recreating the source customisation surface verbatim.

Q&A

Frequently asked

Q. How much does it cost to migrate SharePoint Server to SharePoint Online?

A. Mid-enterprise SharePoint migrations of 100 to 500 site collections typically cost $150,000 to $800,000 all-in. The cost per site collection ranges from $400 for a simple document library to $8,000+ for a heavily customised site with workflows, web parts, and InfoPath forms. The dominant cost drivers are custom code remediation, SharePoint Designer workflow rewrite to Power Automate, and InfoPath form replacement.

Q. What happens to SharePoint Designer workflows?

A. SharePoint Online no longer supports SharePoint Designer workflows. They must be rewritten as Power Automate flows. The conversion is rarely one-to-one because the two engines have different action sets, different connector models, and different error-handling patterns. A typical SharePoint Designer workflow takes 4 to 24 hours to rewrite in Power Automate depending on complexity. Mid-enterprise estates often have 100 to 500 SharePoint Designer workflows accumulated over a decade.

Q. What about InfoPath forms?

A. InfoPath was officially deprecated in 2014 and reaches full end-of-life in October 2026 for SharePoint Online. InfoPath forms must be replaced with Power Apps (for new forms) or Microsoft Lists with custom forms (for simpler scenarios). The replacement cost is typically $2,000 to $12,000 per form depending on complexity. Mid-enterprise estates often have 50 to 300 InfoPath forms with associated business processes.

Q. Can custom SharePoint solutions migrate?

A. Farm solutions (full-trust .NET code deployed to the SharePoint farm) cannot migrate to SharePoint Online. They must be rewritten as SharePoint Framework (SPFx) extensions or Power Platform components. Sandbox solutions and SharePoint Add-ins migrate with minimal change but the model is being phased out. The cost of replacing farm solutions varies enormously: simple branding solutions might rewrite as SPFx for $5K to $20K; complex business applications can require $50K to $300K+ of rebuild work.

Q. What tooling should I use?

A. Microsoft's SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) handles core content and basic permissions for SharePoint 2013, 2016, 2019, and Subscription Edition sources. For SharePoint 2010 sources, third-party tools (Quest Metalogix Content Matrix, AvePoint Fly, ShareGate Migrate) are usually required. ShareGate Migrate is the dominant choice for mid-enterprise SharePoint to SharePoint migrations because of its strength in customisation discovery and permission scenarios.

Q. How long does a SharePoint migration take?

A. Small migrations of under 20 site collections complete in 8 to 16 weeks. Mid-enterprise migrations of 100 to 500 site collections take 6 to 18 months. Large enterprise migrations of 1,000+ site collections run 12 to 30 months. The timeline is dominated by customisation discovery and remediation, not data movement. Site collections themselves can migrate in hours; the workflow rewrites and form rebuilds take months.

Related

Read next

Updated 2 May 2026